Is anybody still using Windows 95 in 2019?

Yes, some people are still using Windows 95.
Some games won't run on anything newer. As well, Windows 95 gets you very close to “real" DOS, even if it isn't an independent, separate DOS; actually, it's MS-DOS 7.0, because MS-DOS 6.22 was the last independent DOS that was separate from Windows 3.x.
Some people have very old computer hardware , and apparently
  1. they've never heard of Linux,
  2. don't know how to use Linux,
  3. the application they need to run won't run under WINE (WINE Is Not an Emulator) on Linux and
  4. won’t run on any more modern operating system (except possibly in a virtualized environment, as I’ll explain below).
  5. They just plain like running Windows 95
  6. A combination of the above.
That’s when Windows 95 is run directly on “bare metal”, as opposed to running it in a virtualized environment. However, it is possible, using either VMware Workstation Player or Oracle VirtualBox, to run Window 95 as a “virtual machine”, or VM. Running an operating system as a VM means that the virtualization software tricks the operating system into thinking it’s running directly on the metal-plastic-and-silicon hardware of a computer, when in fact, though it has an image file to load into RAM, the VM is available only as long as the virtualization software is active and the VM has been started and loaded into RAM.
It’s far safer, unless one absolutely must use Windows 95 on bare metal, as in points #3 and #4 above, to run Windows 95 in a virtualized environment. Anyway, Windows 95 won’t run on more modern hardware, and must never run directly on solid-state drive hardware. This is also true of Windows 98, Me, 2000, XP, and Vista (the last of which should never be run period. Ever). These operating systems were not designed for SSD technology and will destroy an SSD very quickly. The only Windows versions that can handle SSDs are Windows 7, 8.0, 8.1, and 10.

Comments